From Paul
The especially sad thing is how climate change pushers have taken over the environmental movement to the point that very little is actually being done about the environment. All the effort in capping and trading CO2 and getting it declared a “pollutant” as sucked the energy out of solving actual environmental problems: the poisoning of the oceans with mercury, the cutting down of rain forests, the pollution of water systems with MTBE (ironically pushed by environmentalists as “cleaner gas”).
CO2 doesn’t cause cancer, it doesn’t cause birth defects, it doesn’t cause respiratory ailments, it doesn’t cause acid rain, it doesn’t cause extinctions.
You know how to deal with CO2? Instead of wasting money capping and trading, how about spending a few billions to plan more trees instead of trying to get world governments to spend trillions on doing nothing to actually protect the environment.
The climate change movement is so misguided, it is maddening!
.....before you take the word of climate scientists at face value the next time, I suggest you do a little researching on the following:Piltdown Man Scientific Fraud
Cold Fusion Scientific Fraud
Human Cloning Scientific Fraud
All these were major science stories that were fraudulently peddled by a few misguided scientists who somehow managed to create a scientific consensus around their fraud for varying periods of time, with the new media buying into the whole thing.
Climate science has enough 747-sized holes in it that it’s time for journalists to actually start asking questions instead of being advocates.
From Trevor Louinay:
AGW is a conspiracy and a hoax being used to ramrod greater government control over the world’s economies into being. It is all about funneling power and wealth away from the people towards the intellectual classes. Any journalist with a leftist bent will swallow the AGW story uncritically, even should the Gulf of Mexico freeze over, because it reinforces their biases, since they already believe they can trust whatever the government says, and believe greater government control over the economy is the right thing to do anyway.
It is a lie. These same academics falsifying their data to push this AGW meme are the ones who in a socialist system would exercise control over the economy, and would reap the material benefits, just as in the old Eastern Bloc. No longer would the market determine where resources get allocated! No, some tweed-wearing twit in an ivory tower would make those decisions instead!
I laugh at these so-called “sophisticates” who tell us up is down and cold is hot, so confident in their allegedly superior knowledge used only to puff up their overinflated since of self-importance that they cannot see their hands in front of their faces. The emperor has no clothes.